MAJOR CONTRACT AWARDED, Logistik Unicorp to Provide Canadian Forces With Operational Clothing & Footwear

By David Pugliese

LOGISTIK UNICORP BASED in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec, has received a significant contract to provide operational clothing and footwear to the Canadian Armed Forces for years to come.

The contract is valued at up to $3.7 billion over 20 years if all options are exercised.

The deal will see the delivery of approximately 1,222 different items of clothing and footwear worn by CAF members during their deployments. Included in the contract would be combat uniforms using Canadian Disruptive Pattern (CADPAT) camouflage; badges and insignias; footwear including combat boots, arid/hot weather boots, and mukluks; winter gear such as parkas, headwear and hand wear; and soldiers’ personal equipment, such as sleeping bags and day packs.

This contract will cover items for more than 160,000 people, including Regular and Reserve Force members, Canadian Rangers, Junior Rangers, search and rescue technicians, firefighters and cadets, according to the Department of National Defence. Also included are provisions to enable the ad hoc procurement of equipment required for unexpected deployment operations – such as the immediate supply of personal protective equipment during emergencies.

Once the contract is fully implemented, CAF members will be able to order items online and have orders shipped to their door, while also providing the CAF with the ability to continue distributing uniforms directly to units. This new approach will deliver better resource and inventory management for the CAF, improve item availability, and provide better value for taxpayers, according to the Department of National Defence.

Defence Minister Anita Anand visits Logistik Unicorp to announce the new contract for military clothing. (CANADIAN FORCES PHOTO)

Government officials say the deal will support over 3000 jobs in Canada’s clothing, footwear and textile industries.

Logistik Unicorp will invest in research and development and skills training in the textile, apparel and footwear sectors, which will generate additional jobs and export opportunities Defence Minister Anita Anand said the new contract with Logistik Unicorp will ensure that CAF members have the equipment they need, when they need it.

Currently, operational clothing and footwear items are being procured through multiple individual contracts. By combining the various contracts into one, the federal government believes it will achieve greater efficiency and availability of items the CAF needs and better value for taxpayers.

Logistik Unicorp based in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec, has received a significant contract to provide operational clothing and footwear to the Canadian Armed Forces for years to come. (CANADIAN FORCES PHOTO)

Delivery of items to CAF clothing stores will commence during the second year of the contract, and individual online ordering capability is targeted to be implemented during the third year.

Since 1996, the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces have been using a consolidated clothing contract for dress uniform (non-operational clothing). Additional functionalities for users have been added, including online ordering. This approach, renewed in 2020 as the Non-Operational Clothing and Footwear Contract with Logistik Unicorp Inc., continues to supply non-operational clothing for 160,000 Canadian Forces full-time personnel, reservists, and cadets. With the latest deal, DND says it is taking a similar approach to the procurement of operational clothing and footwear.

In addition, Logistik will be required to conform to mandatory requirements of the Canadian Content Policy, as well as to ensure that the manufacturing of clothing and footwear items continues to be done in Canada.

“Logistik Unicorp is proud to have been selected to continue supporting the Canadian Armed Forces with their supply and equipment needs, which our Canadian military members continue to proudly wear while serving around the world,” said Karine Bibeau, Vice-President, Client Experience at Logistik. “Part of what makes Logistik Unicorp’s uniform programs stand out is the relentless pursuit of innovation through research & develop- ment practices, and commitment to proactively help our clients improve their services.”

Logistik Unicorp is considered a Canadian leader in Man- aged Clothing Solutions for uniform and personal equipment.

It provides high-quality, innovative and functional clothing, footwear and equipment to more than 600,000 individuals worldwide, including 325,000 Canadians in various corporations, government departments and agencies. The firm provides a turnkey solution: IT systems, research and development, design, production, procurement, quality assurance, customer service, secure warehousing and distribution.

Logistik Unicorp has a supply chain and network of domestic and international partners, with the group’s subsidiaries in Aus- tralia, New Zealand, Germany, Tunisia and Vietnam serving a global customer base.

MV ASTERIX: An Unexpected Shipbuilding Success Story

by David Pugliese

The U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer USS Dewey is refueled by MV Asterix during RIMPAC 2018. (US NAVY PHOTO)

THE BIGGEST SUCCESS story of the National Shipbuilding Strategy is actually one that was never planned for under the federal government’s initiative.

The 26,000-tonne MV Asterix, a commercial vessel converted for naval resupply purposes by Davie Shipbuilding in Quebec and leased to the Canadian government by the firm’s affiliate Federal Fleet Services, is now fully integrated into the Royal Canadian Navy’s fleet. Just months after being delivered in early 2018 to the military it was at sea supporting RCN and allied operations. The RCN has come to rely so much on Asterix – now its only supply vessel – that the service increased the days the ship was required almost immediately. And several months ago the RCN and Public Services and Procurement Canada announced it would extend the navy’s use of Asterix until 2025.

What wasn’t publicized is that for years federal bureaucrats fought against the Asterix project ever coming to fruition.

These days, however, with the National Shipbuilding Strategy having few real successes, Asterix is now hailed by the federal government as a triumph of government decision-making. In fact it was never envisioned as part of the NSS and was only developed because of the failure of the NSS to produce in a timely fashion the Joint Support Ships that are still on order.

The RCN had at one time operated three supply ships of its own but by 2014 all had been retired from service. Ongoing delays in the construction of the two Joint Support Ships prompted the then Conservative Party government in 2015 to enter into the deal with Davie and Federal Fleet for Asterix.

The Liberal government originally tried to derail the $670 million Asterix project shortly after being elected in the fall of 2015. But the Liberals eventually backed down after much pushback from the Quebec government and the shipyard and its workers. The Asterix project continued and the converted ship was delivered on time and on budget.

Asterix’s success still hasn’t stopped a PR campaign by some in the RCN to portray the vessel as less than capable. They claim Asterix isn’t a true military vessel. That is indeed true but those same officers don’t point out that the “true” military vessels – the Joint Support Ships – are now seven years behind schedule and double the cost.

Davie and Federal Fleet Services have also disputed the claim Asterix can’t go into a war zone. Company officials point out Asterix can be used in combat as the vessel has been outfitted with similar navigation and other systems that will eventually be installed on a new future fleet of Canadian warships. In addition, the company has acquired insurance coverage for the vessel to operate in high risk and war risk areas, Davie noted in a previous statement on its website.

The vessel can also be outfitted with advanced self-defence weapons, a capability Davie originally proposed to the Department of National Defence. But the installation of high-powered Phalanx guns – currently in storage in a military depot – was turned down by bureaucrats as a cost-saving measure. “The ship can go wherever the Canadian Armed Forces require it to go,” Davie said on its website in response to questions about whether Asterix can be used in combat.

Politics, and the protection of military and bureaucratic careers, have played a key role in efforts to limit the success of the Asterix project. In 2018 Davie offered the Asterix’s sister vessel, Obelix, for $500 million outright. The vessel could have been delivered to the RCN within 24 months, the firm noted.

From the point of view of military capability, the offer should have been immediately accepted, as the RCN should have two to three supply and refueling ships.

But it was rejected by the Canadian Forces and government. Why?

Acquiring such a capable ship quickly and at a low cost would have prompted questions why taxpayers were paying four times the amount and waiting years for a similar capability in the Joint Support Ships. It also would have raised embarrassing questions about why the NSS has failed to deliver on many of its promises.

DELAY HAS SILVER LINING, Asterix’s service to Royal Canadian Navy to be extended

by David Pugliese

The Canadian government is in discussions with Federal Fleet Services to further extend the support the Motor Vessel (MV) Asterix provides to the Royal Canadian Navy. The extension is needed because of additional delays to the Joint Support Ship project, said Simon Page, assistant deputy minister for defence and marine procurement at Public Services and Procurement Canada. The first Joint Supply Ship won’t be delivered until 2025 and the second won’t arrive until 2027, Page confirmed to Esprit de Corps.

The Canadian government is in discussions with Federal Fleet Services to further extend the support the Motor Vessel (MV) Asterix provides to the Royal Canadian Navy. (DAVID PUGLIESE PHOTO)

The MV Asterix was initially contracted into service in January 2018 for a five-year period with the option to extend by up to five additional one-year increments. “The ongoing discussions are to exercise two of the one year option periods to extend the term of the contract for the interim use of the MV Asterix until January 2025, as requested by the Department of National Defence,” PSPC spokeswoman Katherine Proulx told Esprit de Corps.

She said at this point it is not known exactly when the new arrangement will be put in place. “The intent is that the agreement is in place prior to the expiry of the current service period in January 2023,” she added. Asterix has come a long way since it was unveiled on July 20, 2017 at the Davie yards in front of Canadian Armed Forces senior leaders and federal, provincial and municipal politicians.

The Asterix project involved the conversion of a modern, European-built containership into an Auxiliary Oiler Replenishment ship. (DAVID PUGLIESE PHOTO)

The 26,000-tonne Asterix, a commercial vessel converted for naval resupply purposes by Davie Shipbuilding in Quebec and leased to the Canadian government by the firm’s affiliate Federal Fleet Services, has been fully integrated into the RCN’s fleet for years now.

The $670 million project has provided the RCN for the first time since 2015 with its own capability to refuel and resupply its ships. The vessel is seen as an interim Auxiliary Oiler Replenishment ship until the Joint Support Ship fleet is built and delivered. Asterix is the largest naval platform in service with the RCN and provides a wide range of functions from at-sea replenishment of fuels and cargo to aviation support, fleet medical support and humanitarian and disaster relief.

The project involved the conversion of a modern, Europeanbuilt containership into an Auxiliary Oiler Replenishment ship. Under a lease agreement, Federal Fleet Services is providing the ship and a civilian crew to operate the vessel. Royal Canadian Navy personnel are on board to handle communications and the actual transfer of supplies and fuel to warships.

The price tag includes the conversion of Asterix, the lease of its services to the Royal Canadian Navy for five years, maintenance and the salaries of a civilian crew to operate the vessel.

Asterix is able to carry two Royal Canadian Air Force Cyclone maritime helicopters and also has medical facilities on board. If needed, it could carry a Chinook helicopter.

In addition, it has space for light armoured vehicles and other equipment.

The RCN has a commanding officer on board the vessel to oversee military personnel while that officer does tactical level liaison with Federal Fleet Services, directing how the ship is used for the Navy’s operations.

The size of the RCN crew fluctuates. It can range from 45 to 67 sailors, depending on the training or operations underway.

Besides sailors trained in replenishment duties, there are medical, dental, engineering and communications personnel from the Canadian Armed Forces serving on the ship. Asterix is outfitted with six .50 calibre machineguns but Phalanx weapon systems can be added if needed. (Davie originally proposed to the Department of National Defence that Phalanx guns be installed but that was turned down by bureaucrats as a costsaving measure.)

Vice-Admiral Angus Topshee, commander of the Royal Canadian Navy, said Asterix’s role is important as it allows sailors to continue using their skills in replenishing ships at sea. “Asterix is extremely helpful because it allows us to put sailors on board the ship so they maintain the skills with the delivery of fuel to the receiving vessel,” he explained to Esprit de Corps. “And Asterix, even though it only operates in one ocean at a time, does have crews of those sailors and the enablers from both coasts, to make sure that both coasts sustain that skill.”

Davie offered to sell the Liberal government a second similar ship, Obelix, at a cost of around $500 million. The proposed deal had the support of the Conservative Party as well. The vessel could be delivered to the RCN within 24 months, Davie noted in its proposal.

In addition, the Senate’s defence committee recommended the federal government not only buy Asterix outright but purchase Obelix. It originally suggested that deal be put in place by 2018. The Liberal government, however, rejected the proposal.

The federal government does not appear to be changing course on that decision, even with the further delays of the Joint Support Ships. “We are currently in discussion with Federal Fleet Services to extend the current contract that we have with them for the services of the Asterix,” Page responded to a question about the potential purchase of Obelix. “There is no, there is no discussion about a purchase.”

The Liberal government originally tried to derail the Asterix project shortly after being elected in the fall of 2015. The move came after cabinet ministers, including Scott Brison and then Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan received a letter from the Irving family with a complaint that an Irving proposal for a similar supply ship was not examined properly. Irving has denied any suggestion it was involved in political meddling.

The Liberals eventually backed down after the Quebec government and shipyard workers in the province accused it of trying to scuttle the Davie Asterix deal. In addition, there was a penalty fee of $89 million if the federal government decided not to proceed with the Asterix project. Conversion of Asterix was ultimately approved by the Liberal government and the ship was delivered on time and on budget.

GROUND BASED AIR DEFENCE: Back On The Agenda For Canadian Army

by David Pugliese

AFTER YEARS OF being without a ground-based air defence, the Canadian Armed Forces is ready to begin the process to acquire a system capable of shooting down enemy aircraft, missiles and drones.

Federal government procurement specialists will request information from the defence industry sometime this year as the Canadian Army works out the specifics of what it wants in such a system.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has shown the value of air defence systems. Here Canadian soldiers train with a man-portable air- defence system (MANPAD). (CANADIAN FORCES PHOTO)

Defence analysts and retired generals have pointed to the Russian invasion of Ukraine as evidence of the need for such equipment. The Liberal government originally outlined the pro- posed purchase in its 2018 defence capability plan. At that point, the government stated such a ground-based air defence system would cost between $250 million and $499 million.

But, even before the procurement process has begun in earnest, that price tag has increased to what observers are saying is a more realistic cost estimate. During an April 5 brief- ing in Ottawa, Canadian Army officials told defence industry representatives the cost would now be between $500 million and $1 billion.

A contact is expected to be awarded in 2026 and the first systems would be in place a year later, industry officials were told. Interestingly, Army officers consider the main threats the new system would be used to deal with are rocket, artillery and mortar munitions, air to surface missiles and bombs, and remotely piloted

aircraft systems.”
During the April 5 briefing, industry officials were informed the

system would also be able to target cruise missiles, helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. The new system wouldn’t be capable of dealing with larger weapons, such as theatre ballistic missiles or intercontinental ballistic missiles.

The Canadian Army will consider systems with guns or missiles or both. It still has to examine whether it wants the air defence system mounted on light armoured vehicles or something smaller, such as trucks.

The Canadian Army was outfitted in 1989 with a then state- of-the art air defence anti-tank system known as ADATS, shown here during military exercises. But, faced with budget cuts ordered by the Conservative government, the Army announced it was removing ADATS from service in 2012. (CANADIAN FORCES PHOTO)

The package could also include a sensor suite, fire control software and an integrated networked C4ISR system. It would be equipped with a training and simulation system that leverages modelling and simulation to provide realistic and immersive training, according to the Canadian Armed Forces.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has shown the value of air defence systems, according to defence analysts. Ukraine has been able to prevent Russia’s air force from controlling the skies over the battlefield using a variety of anti-aircraft missiles and weapons. The war has also highlighted a gap in the Canadian military’s capabilities as it has been without an air defence system for the past decade.

The Canadian Army was outfitted in 1989 with a then state-of-the art air defence anti-tank system known as ADATS. It was purchased to protect bases in Germany against attack by the Russians, but, shortly after ADATS was delivered, the Cold War ended and the systems were shipped back to Canada. ADATS was occasionally used for domestic security, including to provide protection from potential air threats during the G8 summit in Alberta in 2002.

But, faced with budget cuts ordered by the Conservative government, the Army announced it was removing ADATS from service in 2012.

The move left the Canadian Forces without a primary air defence system. Army officers acknowledged at the time that decision was risky, but the service had determined it was accept- able in the short term. The Army had plans to introduce a new air defence system around 2017, but that project never went forward.

In 2020, then Army commander Lt.-Gen. Wayne Eyre told Esprit de Corps that ground-based air defence was a priority for the service. “We see the evolving threat from drones, from rockets, and other forms of indirect fire,” said Eyre, who has since been promoted to Chief of the Defence Staff. “We have to be able to protect ourselves.”

He noted that sophisticated sensors capable of identifying the location of enemy positions as well as detecting incoming warheads would be particularly important for ground-based air defence. CANADA’S ADATS

Back in the 1990s, the Canadian Army was one of the few military organizations operating the ADATS, which had been designed to provide air defence protection for mobile troops as well as ground installations. That self-contained weapon system was mounted on a tracked M113 and capable of performing during day or night and in adverse weather. ADATS was operated by a crew of three (driver, commander/radar operator, and electro-optical operator), plus three personnel in a support vehicle, according to the Canadian Armed Forces. It carried eight ready-to-fire missiles which traveled at a speed of Mach 3+ to a range of over eight kilometres. Its sensors included search radar and an electro-optical device contained a TV and Forward Looking Infrared Radar (FLIR).

ADATS first entered service with the Air Defence Artillery School located at CFB Chatham N. B. in 1989, with 34 units purchased. It was considered state-of-the-art at the time.

But after a series of budget cuts, the Canadian Army decided to shed its the ground based air defence capability. In 2005, the Army determined that the primary role of ADATS was “to be direct fire” with air defence a secondary role.

But the Army’s efforts to dump GBAD were met with serious concern, particularly in the Royal Canadian Air Force. The office of then Maj.-Gen. Charles Bouchard tried to push back against the Army, according to 2005 documents obtained by Esprit de Corps.

“While understood and not unexpected, this planned reduction in GBAD capability is happening at a time when the asymmetric threat and associated response dictates that the requirement for such a capability remains valid,” Bouchard’s office responded in a 2005 briefing note for the Canadian Army.

While the Army commander saw little need to maintain GBAD for an expeditionary role, Bouchard’s office countered with the following: “This capability does have a utility from both a NORAD and a domestic operations perspective.”

In fact, during a May 2005 NORAD planning conference, the joint U.S.-Canadian air defence command had identified the requirement “for a rapidly deployable” air defence capability for national special security events or important gatherings such as a G8 conference, according to the records.

But the RCAF’s concerns only delayed the inevitable. Almost all ADATS were declared surplus, and except for a few units for testing and support, the GBAD capability all but disappeared in 2012.

RCAF IN THE MIDST OF MAJOR EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION DRIVE

By David Pugliese

The Royal Canadian Air Force is re-equipping with major projects about to deliver over the next two years. (CANADIAN FORCES PHOTO)

OVER THE NEXT two years announcements are expected to be made on signed contracts for new fighter jets, refueling aircraft and drones. In addition, a contract will be signed within that period for a new training provider for the RCAF.

Here is a rundown of what is soon to be acquired.

F35

A deal is expected by the end of this year or early 2023 for the acquisition of 88 F-35 aircraft. Negotiations are ongoing between Canada, the U.S. government and Lockheed Martin.

The Liberal government announced March 28 it was entering into the negotiations to buy the F-35, retreating on Justin Trudeau’s promise Canada would never acquire the aircraft he claimed didn’t work and wasn’t needed. Although federal govern- ment officials have recently claimed that this is not a done deal, essentially it is. There is no turning back now that the F-35 has been selected.

Defence Minister Anita Anand told analysts during a confer- ence May 10 that the U.S. government is more than happy with Canada’s selection of the Lockheed Martin stealth fighter. The F-35 acquisition by Canada guarantees more American jobs, and to a lesser extent domestic work. “(In) our discussions with the U.S., they are very pleased that we are going to be working on the same footing with regards to the future fighter capability,” Anand said.

In addition, the Liberal government has used the Russian invasion of Ukraine to justify its purchase of fighter.

But there could be problems on the horizon. Pentagon officials have raised concerns about the high cost to operate the F-35.

An April 28 U.S. Government Accountability Office report also warned about the aircraft’s reliability. “The F-35 continues to not meet its targets for mission capable rates—a measure of the readiness of an aircraft fleet—or its reliability and maintain- ability metrics,” the GOA reported.

The RCAF is planning for the eventual replacement for the CP-140 Aurora aircraft. Dubbed the Canadian Multi-Mission Aircraft (CMMA), a request for information was released to the aerospace industry in February. (CANADIAN FORCES PHOTO)

Dan Grazier, an F-35 critic at the Project on Government Oversight in the U.S., has written that neither the Russians or other adversaries need to be worried about from the stealth fighter. To make his point, Grazier cited an internal Pentagon report warn- ing about repeated F-35 breakdowns and a lack of spare parts. “Despite more than 20 years and approximately $62.5 billion spent so far on research and development alone, program officials still haven’t been able to deliver an aircraft that can fly as often as needed or to demonstrate its ability to perform in combat, which places military personnel in jeopardy,” Grazier wrote in a report for POGO last month.

RPAS

In February the Canadian government officially requested bids for its remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS) project.

Two firms have been approved to bid on the RPAS project.

Team Artemis, led by L3Harris Technologies, located in Mirabel, Quebec, and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), has a Canadian organization of four companies. Those firms include Airbus Defence and Space Canada, located in Ontario; ATCO Frontec, Canadian UAVs and Lockheed Martin CDL Systems, located in Alberta. Two key Canadian suppliers, L3Harris in Ontario and Pratt & Whitney Canada in Quebec will provide crucial components of the system.

The second bidder will be Team SkyGuardian. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. CAE, MDA, and L3 Harris are part of that team that is offering the MQ-9B SkyGuardian to fulfill Canada’s RPAS requirements.

RPAS will provide the Canadian Armed Forces with the ability to conduct long endurance surveillance missions over long dis- tances, using a variety of sensors. This will help support airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, with near-real time information to inform senior leadership.

At home, the capability will help the military monitor Canada’s large territory and long coastline. It will also support special security events such as international summits like the G8 and Canadian Armed Forces operations in aid of civil authority, like responses to forest fires and floods.

In deployed operations, an RPAS will provide commanders an overview of operational situations with near-real time information, according to the CAF. The system will be capable of detect- ing, recognizing, identifying, and tracking targets of interest in complex environments.

While the RPAS will be a medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) system with a precision strike capability, it will only be armed when necessary for the assigned task, National Defence officials told Esprit de Corps. At all times, employment of precision strike capability will adhere to the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC), as well as any other applicable domestic or international laws. Use of force will be applied following rules of engagement (ROE) applicable to the CAF.

The number of RPAS will be based on the ability to support three simultaneous lines of tasking. Bidders are to propose how many air vehicles will be required to support the three lines of tasking.

The estimated RPAS procurement cost is $1 billion to $4.99 billion dollars. That includes RPAS acquisition, initial set-up of training and maintenance services, associated equipment, infra- structure, and set-up to enable the aircraft to enter into service.

Significant economic benefits for Canadian industry are a key element in this procurement and National Defence officials say the RPAS project presents a unique opportunity to ensure a high level of Canadian industrial participation and ensure support for the Canadian aerospace and defence sectors. Given the size and scope of the RPAS project, there are considerable leveraging opportunities to contribute to jobs, innovation and economic growth across the country, they added.

The aircraft will be stationed at 14 Wing Greenwood, NS, and 19 Wing Comox, BC. The aircraft will also be operated out of a Forward Operating Location at Yellowknife, NWT when supporting missions in northern Canada. The ground control centre, which will house the aircraft cockpits, will be located in the Ottawa area.

A formal request for proposal or RFP was issued Feb. 11, 2022.

These are expected timelines:
• Contract award: fiscal year 2023/24
• First delivery: fiscal year 2025/26 to 2026/27
• Initial operational capability: fiscal year 2027/28 to 2029/30 • Full operational capability: fiscal year 2030/31 to 2032/33

STRATEGIC TANKER TRANSPORT CAPABILITY

The Strategic Tanker Transport Capability is also critical to the RCAF. Interestingly, it is the highlighted in Defence Minister Anita Anand’s Mandate Letter from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Anand’s press secretary, Daniel Minden, said the project is about acquiring a new fleet of aircraft to replace the CC-150 Polaris. The new fleet will conduct multiple tasks, such as in- flight refuelling of other aircraft, military personnel and cargo airlift, medical evacuations, and strategic transport of Canadian government officials, Minden said.

In April 2021, Airbus emerged as the only qualified supplier for that new fleet of Canadian Forces refueling planes and VIP aircraft. The aircraft deemed to be qualified for the job is the Airbus A330 MRTT, which is a dual-role refueling and transport plane.

The A330 MRTT, a military variant of a civilian airliner, can carry up to 111 tonnes of fuel. Canada hopes to have a contract in place by before spring 2024, with the first A330 MRTT expected to be operational in 2028. RCAF officers remain confident that the Canadian military can, until then, rely on the existing fleet of CC-150 Polaris aircraft.

The Canadian Forces has been using the Polaris since 1994.

AIRCREW TRAINING

Bids are being prepared by companies for the Future Aircrew Training (FaCT) project. The request for proposals was released Feb. 11 and is set to close in October.

Two candidates are in the running for the contract: SkyAlyne, a partnership between Canadian companies KF Aerospace and CAE; and the Babcock Leonardo Canadian Aircrew Training team.

The government expects to award the multi-billion-dollar FAcT contract in 2023. Now that the RFP has been released, both bid- ders are hard at work crafting proposals that will meet the stated requirements and provide the next generation of RCAF aircrews with a solid foundation for their operational careers.

On December 16, 2020, the Canadian government released the draft Request to Proposals to the three qualified suppliers: Babcock Canada Inc., Leonardo Canada, and SkyAlyne Canada Limited Partnership. On Aug. 11, 2021, Babcock Canada Inc. and Leonardo Canada announced a new joint-venture called ‘Babcock Leonardo Canadian Aircrew Training’. They signed a Teaming Agreement that will see Babcock Canada and Leonardo Canada come together to be considered for Future Aircrew Training program.

FaCT will replace existing pilot training programs, as well as other RCAF programs for training Air Combat Systems Officers and Airborne Electronic Sensor Operators trades. This is being done in order to advance the effectiveness and efficiencies through what the RCAF calls “a common, more holistic approach to training aircrew.”

The RCAF has determined that the basing solution for the Future Aircrew Training program will remain status quo. Ab-initio pilot training will be delivered in Moose Jaw and Southport. Ab-initio training for Air Combat Systems Officers and Airborne Electronic Sensor Operators will be delivered in Winnipeg.

FWSAR

The Airbus C-295 was selected as the RCAF’s new fixed wing search and rescue aircraft. The RCAF will call the plane, the Kingfisher.

The Canadian Armed Forces has four Kingfisher aircraft in the country and another six aircraft have been accepted in Spain. These aircraft are not operationally ready upon acceptance as there remains outstanding certification and qualification work, followed by operational testing.

The existing Airbus C295 aircraft has been certified by civilian and military agencies for airworthiness. However, in order to meet the Canadian requirements for search and rescue and as part of their initial proposal, Airbus included over thirty design changes to the base model for the C-295 Kingfisher, according to National Defence officials. These changes have resulted in a requirement for additional certifications. Along with this, and challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic, the volume and sequencing of work by Airbus and by the Canadian Armed Forces requires more time, contributing to delays. Because of that, the initial operational capability for the C-295 has been delayed from this summer to 2025. Full operational capability will be reached in fiscal year 2029-30, according to the RCAF.

AURORA REPLACEMENT

Farther out is the acquisition of an eventual replacement for the CP-140 Aurora aircraft. Dubbed the Canadian Multi-Mission Aircraft (CMMA), a request for information was released to the aerospace industry in February.

The current Aurora fleet consists of 14 aircraft which have been in service since the 1980s. However, those planes have been over the years significantly upgraded.

The funding for the CMMA project is estimated at more than $5 billion. Options analysis for the CMMA will start this year, with the project in full swing in 2027. The initial delivery of the first aircraft is estimated to take place in 2032 and final delivery in 2037.

The request for information is intended to be a starting point for the project, according to federal government officials. Public Services and Procurement Canada, on behalf of the Department of National Defence, is seeking input from industry on the manda- tory requirements and capability requirements.

Minimum operational capabilities will include the following: Search and Rescue (SAR); Command, Control, Communications, Computers (C4), Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) (C4ISR); Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW); Anti-Surface Warfare (ASuW); Communications Relay; Network Extension; and Overland Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance.

The CMMA options to be studied by the RCAF provide a wide range of possibilities. They are:

Buy Military Off The Shelf (MOTS) aircraft – A single new manned Military Off The Shelf (MOTS) aircraft fleet would be procured with minimal or no modification required.

Buy and Modify MOTS. A single new manned MOTS aircraft fleet would be procured that meets all high level requirements, with moderate change or modification required.

Buy Civilian Off the Shelf (COTS) and Develop into MOTS

– A single new manned Civilian off-the-Shelf (COTS) aircraft fleet would be procured, with the idea those planes could be developed into a military platform that meets all needed requirements.

Buy Two fleets of MOTS – Two fleets of new manned MOTS aircraft that share a common airframe but have different configurations would be procured.

Buy MOTS and UAS – A fleet of new manned MOTS aircraft and a fleet of new Unmanned Air Systems (UAS) would be purchased. Together this mixed fleet would meet all RCAF requirements.

PR INITIATIVE LAUNCHES AS QUEST FOR NEW SUBMARINES BEGINS

by David Pugliese

THE ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY wants new submarines to replace its Victoria-class boats and has already embarked on a communications plan to convince the public to support that multi-billion dollar program.

Canada will eventually have to replace the aging Victoria class submarines currently in service with the RCN.

In the early summer of 2021 the word went out among some in the defence industry that the RCN would launch a public rela- tions drive to put the purchase of new submarines on the Liberal government’s agenda.

What occurred in the following six months was a testament to the RCN’s use of “stakeholders” and military-friendly journalists to try to shape the defence agenda in Canada.

The campaign kicked off in July when “defence officials revealed” to Lee Berthiaume, a journalist with the Canadian Press, that the RCN was establishing a submarine project office to “inform timely governmental decision-making about a potential replacement class of submarines.”

For good measure Berthiaume quoted David Perry of the Can- adian Global Affairs Institute, an organization closely aligned with the Department of National Defence and one that has received both DND and defence industry funding. In Berthiaume’s July 14 article Perry said the RCN’s need for new submarines could be justified given Russia and China had both ramped up their underwater capabilities in recent years.

The same day Evan Solomon, the popular and pro-military host of shows on both CTV and CFRA radio station, was ready to add to the communications initiative. Solomon had retired Vice Admiral Mark Norman, the former RCN commander, on his radio show to talk about the critical need for the subs to be replaced.

“If the pandemic taught us that you’ve got to be ready for the next threat, you’ve got to be ready,” Solomon told his listeners. “We didn’t have enough PPE. We didn’t have enough vaccines. Then when you’re in the threat people say, ‘Oh my God, We weren’t ready.’ Subs are the very same thing. The next threat is not here but you’ve gotta have that insurance policy. If there’s a threat and you don’t have the subs it’s like having no PPE during the pandemic. It’s nuts.”

Not unsurprisingly, Norman enthusiastically agreed.

Also on that same day, the Ottawa Citizen newspaper pub- lished an opinion column by Robert Smol in which the retired Canadian Forces member lamented about the aging Victoria-class subs. Canada, Smol warned, was lagging behind allies who were all buying new boats.

On July 23, the Globe and Mail newspaper carried an opinion piece by naval historian Alexander Howlett. Howlett claimed Canada could not claim Arctic sovereignty unless it buys new submarines. For good measure he warned that both China and Russia were expanding their influence in the Arctic.

In mid-September the RCN’s submarine PR push hit a new high with the Sept. 15 announcement that Australia would be purchasing nuclear submarines from the U.S., with participation from the United Kingdom. The subs were the centrepiece of a new defence alliance between the three nations.

RCN supporters immediately characterized the development as a significant snub to Canada and the result of the Liberal government not spending enough on defence. David Perry argued Canada was being left out of the “club” because it wasn’t pulling its weight militarily. Stephanie Carvin and Thomas Juneau, both academics with close ties to the DND, also used the Australian- U.S.-UK alliance to support their often-repeated argument that Canada needed to invest more into defence.

In reality, the three-nation alliance was needed because of the exchange of highly sensitive nuclear technology and the fact Australia planned to spend billions buying the new boats from the Americans. The deal was initially estimated to cost $71 billion but there are already estimates the purchase price tag will be more than $170 billion. Whatever the cost, the deal supports a lot of American jobs and buys a lot of good will from the U.S.

What was supposed to be one of the key milestones in the RCN’s public relations campaign came on Sept. 23 when the Macdonald-Laurier Institute released a report by Jeffrey Collins, an assistant professor at the University of Prince Edward Island and a fellow at Perry’s Canadian Global Affairs Institute. That paper called for the Canadian government to purchase new sub- marines but did not provide a price tag. Collins did acknowledge any acquisition would cost more than the several billion dollars the RCN estimated years ago.

VISSC was awarded in 2008 to the Canadian Submarine Management Group, now known as Babcock Canada Inc. to assist the Department of National Defence in delivering on the requirement to sustain and perform in-service support to meet the Royal Canadian Navy’s operational mandates.

The original life expectancy of the Victoria-class Subma- rines was the mid-to late-2020s. However, with the release of Canada’s Defence Policy, Strong, Secure, Engaged in June 2017, Canada has committed to operating and modernizing the Victoria-class submarines to ensure their continued ef- fectiveness out to the mid-2030s.

The Victoria-class submarines operate in open-ocean and deep-sea environments, where they are exposed to pressure-induced stresses resulting from changes in depth, extreme weather conditions, and the corrosive properties of seawater on an on-going basis, the National Defence noted. As such, these vessels, like all submarines, face significant wear and tear, which necessitates a rigorous in-service maintenance schedule to assure the safety of the crew and the submarine, department officials pointed out.