trump

ON TARGET: Trump vs. Kim Jong-Un: Who Is More Dangerous?

By Scott Taylor

To follow the course of recent Western political and media rhetoric, North Korean President Kim Jong-un is a reckless megalomaniac with a goofy haircut who is bent on a nuclear war with the U.S.

All eyes were on the Kim Jong-un regime as they prepared to celebrate the country’s national holiday on April 15. Tradition has it that every year on this date, North Korea flexes its military might with massive parades and displays of firepower in celebration of the birth of the country’s founder. This year was no different as a defiant President Kim Jong-un was expected to conduct yet another nuclear test as well as launch a medium-range missile.

However, the game changer on this side of the Pacific Ocean is that Donald Trump is now in the White House. Facing the lowest domestic approval rating for a president’s first quarter in office, Trump is eagerly seeking foreign distractions.

To counter North Korea’s bluster, Trump dispatched the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier strike group — described by White House spokesman Sean Spicer as “an armada” — to patrol off the Korean peninsula.

U.S. Vice-President Mike Pence was also sent to South Korea to issue a stern warning to the Pyongyang regime that America will no longer tolerate North Korea’s actions. “The era of strategic patience is over,” stated Pence to bring home that point and to illustrate the resolve of Trump to act decisively.

Pence reminded everyone that only hours earlier the U.S. military had launched what is known as the “mother of all bombs” against Daesh fighters in Afghanistan.

The 11-ton MOAB (Massive Ordinance Air Blast) is considered to be the largest non-nuclear explosive device on the planet. It was developed in time for the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, but Saddam’s army melted away before they could test the MOAB. With a three-kilometre destructive diameter, the MOAB was considered too lethal and too indiscriminate to be used in counterinsurgency operations such as Iraq or Afghanistan. That was until Trump needed to send a tough message to North Korea.

The target of the MOAB, we are told by U.S. military officials, was a Daesh (aka ISIS and ISIL) military base. For some reason, these Daesh fighters were in the remote eastern Afghanistan province of Nangarhar, digging a tunnel complex. Given that these tunnels were nowhere near any Afghan villages, there was no risk of any civilian casualties.

In other words, Daesh had inadvertently handed the U.S. Air Force the perfect target to test the world’s biggest non-nuclear bomb: A large group of evildoers huddled together in the middle of nowhere.

With the bombsite still on U.S. military lockdown, we have no way of verifying their claim that 94 Daesh fighters were killed without a single civilian casualty.

The truth of the matter is that the use of the MOAB had nothing to do with eliminating a small band of Daesh fighters in Afghanistan and everything to do with showing North Korea that Trump will drop massive bombs on real targets.

Trump also violated international law on April 6 when he fired 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles into Syria as a punitive measure against President Bashar al-Assad for his alleged involvement in a chemical weapons attack. No independent agency has yet proven who launched that chemical weapon in Syria, yet Trump has already delivered a lethal punishment.

For Kim Jong-un, April 15 turned out to be a bit of a bust. The KN-17 missile that was test fired embarrassingly blew up shortly after take-off, and the satellite imagery of his nuclear test site revealed the workers to be playing a tournament of volleyball at the suspected ground zero.

There are two reckless megalomaniacs with goofy haircuts playing in a game of brinkmanship on the Korean peninsula. It is not yet clear which of the two is more dangerous.

On Target: Is Trump Our BIGGEST Threat?

Donald Trump speaking at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C.photo credit: Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Donald Trump speaking at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C.

photo credit: Gage Skidmore/Flickr

By Scott Taylor

You can call Donald Trump many things, but after his first few months in power it appears that he intends to keep his election campaign promises.

In delivering his first budget last week, Trump boosted discretionary defence spending by a whopping $54-billion (US), which amounts to roughly a 10 per cent increase to the current expenditure.

To realize these additional funds, Trump plans to cut out an equal amount from the budgets of the U.S. State Department and the Environmental Protection Agency. Cut back on diplomats, buy more weapons and to hell with the environment.

Trump also increased funding for border security, including money for the wall he intends to build along the Mexican border. These funds are, of course, only a temporary expenditure until Trump figures out how to make the Mexicans pay for it.

Also included in Trump’s budget was a few billion dollars to help refurbish and renew America’s nuclear arsenal.

Nothing makes a country great again better than its enhanced capability to destroy the planet.

For Canada, Trump’s prioritization of defence spending means that we will be under enormous pressure to boost our own defence budget. The usual military pundits and tub-thumping cheerleaders are like broken records, repeating the same old mantra of two per cent of GDP defence spending objective for Canada. This is of course the same arbitrary percentage that NATO members have agreed to aspire to, but which only a handful of members actually meet.

Canada currently spends roughly one per cent of its GDP on defence. To meet NATO’s goal would require a 100 per cent increase in funding, translating to spending an additional $21-billion a year — every year — on defence. This would mean the loss of a hell of a lot of essential government services beyond defence. The two per cent figure also does not factor in the actual dollars that we spend.

Canada happens to be blessed with an enormous GDP proportionate to our relatively small population. In terms of real dollars spent, Canada ranks 17th in the world (top 10 per cent) and seventh out of the 28 NATO countries. If we were to heed the hawks’ advice and follow Trump’s dictates to reach the arbitrary ‘two per cent of GDP’ goal, Canada would be the 8th largest defence spender in the world and third among NATO countries, behind only the USA and United Kingdom.

Then again, you have to ask yourself why we require such a massive increase in military capability. The current storyline is of course to contain those nasty old Russians. That is why Canada is sending 200 trainers to Ukraine and will soon deploy a 450-strong detachment into Latvia, right along the Russian border.

We know that Russia is bad because after the civil uprising in 2014 destabilized Ukraine, Vladimir Putin occupied and annexed the Crimea to secure Russia’s Black Sea naval base.

Russia is also flexing its muscle by propping up embattled Syrian President Bashar al-Assad — again with the clearly stated intention of securing Russia’s Tartus naval base in the Mediterranean.

However, if Putin is indeed embarking on a campaign of world domination, as the fear mongers would have us believe, he has just taken a very unusual course of action.

Lost amid the swirling speculation caused by Trump’s first budget was the little reported news that the Kremlin has slashed Russia’s military budget by 25 per cent. Due to low oil prices and a slumping economy, Putin has reduced the defence budget from approximately $65-billion (US) to just $48-billion (US).

That’s right folks. Trump’s 10 per cent increase to the U.S. military is now greater than Russia’s entire defence budget.

If the biggest perceived threat to world security is drastically downsizing its military, does it make sense for Canada and the rest of the non-compliant NATO member states to boost their defence budgets by tens of billions of dollars to reach that arbitrary two per cent of GDP objective?